IGNITEEnglish Resources

AI-Resistant Assessment

AI-Literate Learning

Get the Free Audit

Page one of the IGNITE Assignment Audit, titled Where Does Your Assignment Actually Sit? Page two of the Audit, Part A, Can the Shortcut Work?, with questions one to four and a score beside each answer.

George O'Toole, retired Head of Department

Free for Grades 7 to 12 English teachers

Could AI Pass Your Assignment? Find Out in Five Minutes.

Pick one assignment you already use and answer eight questions about it. The Audit tells you how much of it an AI chatbot could do for your students, and the one thing worth changing first.

One of the Eight Questions

So you know what you're getting, this is question one, exactly as it appears in the Audit.

Part A, the floor test, Question 1 of 8

If a student pasted your assignment instructions into an AI chatbot and submitted the result unchanged, what would it earn?

  • Full marks, or close to it0
  • A pass, but not a strong one1
  • It would fail on the specifics it couldn't know2
  • It couldn't produce anything usable3

Seven more questions like this, then a total score out of 24 that names the IGNITE level your assignment is actually asking for. The interactive version scores it for you automatically and puts your weakest answers in the order worth fixing.

One Ordinary Assignment, Before and After

This is a typical Grade 10 essay task, the kind that has been given for 30 years and was perfectly fine until about 2023.

Before

"Write a 1000-word essay explaining how Shakespeare presents the theme of fate in Romeo and Juliet. Due in two weeks."

The one-minute test

Paste those instructions into any AI chatbot. What comes back in mere seconds is a competent essay, with quotations that look right whether or not they are. Nothing in the task asks for anything an AI chatbot can't produce, so nothing in the task stops one.

After

The essay question doesn't change. What you collect does.

  1. In Class, Week One: Students annotate two passages they choose themselves. Dated, and you keep them.
  2. In Class, Week Two: 20 minutes, no devices, write the paragraph that becomes the thesis, working from those annotations.
  3. At Home: Draft the essay. AI is permitted at the Negotiation level, declared, with every prompt you used attached.
  4. On Submission: Name one sentence only you could have written and be ready to say why only you could have written it in about 30 seconds. Be prepared to also answer any questions your teacher might ask you.

An AI chatbot can still write about fate. But it can't stand in for the annotations you collected in class on Tuesday, the 20 minutes you watched a student work, or a student explaining and defending their own choices out loud. The difference is the evidence you collect, not how polished the essay is. One possible weighting for this task: 40% process, 40% in-class thinking, and 20% final product.

That redesign took one page. The Audit does the diagnosis part for you, on your assignment, in five minutes. The method behind it is set out in the five-step redesign.

Audit My Assignment, Free

Six Levels, from Copying to Creating

Every assignment asks for one of these, whether it means to or not. Each level asks more of the student and less of the tool. Higher isn't automatically better: the right level is the one that fits what the task is meant to assess.

  1. Imitation

    Copies AI output with little or no change.

    The level to design against

  2. Guidance

    Follows AI use the teacher has set up or modelled, directs it, and edits what comes back.

    Core target, Grades 7 to 8

  3. Negotiation

    Declares AI use and pushes back: checks, questions, and rejects what it produced.

    The threshold for AI-resistant work

  4. Integration

    Uses AI regularly within stated limits to develop their own ideas.

    Core target, Grades 9 to 10

  5. Transformation

    Questions AI critically to produce work in a form that wouldn't otherwise exist.

    Core target, Grades 11 to 12

  6. Emergent

    Creates something original and meaningful that neither they nor AI could have produced alone.

    Top of the Grades 11 to 12 range

See the Full Framework

From the Articles

Practical pieces for English departments working out what assessment looks like now.

How to Run the Assignment Audit and Redesign One Assignment

How to Run the Assignment Audit and Redesign One Assignment

Start here

The test that starts the Audit, what AI can and can't do in your classroom, and the five steps that turn an assignment an AI chatbot can pass into one it can't.

Stop Using AI Detectors: What Works Instead

Stop Using AI Detectors: What Works Instead

Understand the problem

Why detection software is the wrong basis for an integrity decision, and the three kinds of evidence that work instead.

What Critical AI Literacy Looks Like in Classrooms

What Critical AI Literacy Looks Like in Classrooms

The bigger question

Why "Did you use AI?" is becoming the wrong question, and three classroom moves that let you see the thinking while it happens.

All the Articles

George O'Toole, smiling, in a dark shirt

Built by a Teacher Who's Still in Classrooms

The IGNITE Framework was developed by George O'Toole, a retired Ontario Secondary School English Head of Department with over 35 years in the subject. He still takes supply work, so the classroom isn't a memory, it's his reality.

"Flexible enough to use with other disciplines, and useful for assignment design and conversations about ethical AI use."

Stephen H., Grade 11 teacher, on the IGNITE Framework

Experience Leading Teacher Learning

35+

years in secondary English

8

secondary schools coached

9

system-wide PD workshops delivered

3

Additional Qualification courses taught at Queen's

See George's full experience

Meet George Read the Articles